Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration HHS
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA

Evidence of Trends, Risk Factors, and Intervention Strategies

 

Chapter III Risk Factors for Poor Birth Outcomes

Eliminating racial/ethnic disparities in perinatal outcomes requires thorough knowledge of their causes. Researchers suggest that several factors contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in perinatal health: stress, environment, genetics, economic resources and socioeconomic status, health behavior, access to and availability of health care services, and quality of health care (Hogan et al. 2001). In this chapter, evidence on the behavioral, biological, and social risk factors for poor perinatal outcomes in the context of racial/ethnic disparities is presented. Table III.1 lists the risk factors discussed. In categorizing risk factors as behavioral, biological, and social, the interdependent nature of risk factors between and within categories is recognized. For example, a biological risk factor such as depression can lead to behavioral risk factors, such as alcohol use and smoking during pregnancy. As a result, the risk factors in relationship to each other are discussed whenever possible. The inter-related quality of these risk factors also makes it challenging to pinpoint the direct contribution of each factor to poor birth outcomes. Adding to this challenge is women' s possible self-selection to certain risk groups (such as those receiving late or no prenatal care). Therefore, no attempt is made to draw direct causal relationships between risk factors and adverse birth outcomes, but a link between the two, acknowledging the influence of other factors is illustrated.

This chapter provides insight into areas where targeted maternal and child health interventions through programs, such as Healthy Start, could help reduce racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes. Therefore, issues related to socioeconomics, clinical practice, genetics, and access to health care are not directly discussed. However, these issues in relation to the risk factors presented in the chapter is acknowledged. For example, some behavioral factors, such as getting early prenatal care and obtaining well child visits, can be influenced by a woman' s ability to access this care and her knowledge about such care. Despite these multiple influences on a woman' s ultimate behavior, this discussion emphasizes the need for interventions and systems to encourage, support, and reinforce positive perinatal behaviors.

Table III.1.Behavioral and Biological/Social Risk Factors for Poor Birth Outcomes[D]

BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTORS

 

PREVENTIVE BEHAVIORS

Prenatal Care

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that all pregnant women initiate prenatal care in the first trimester and continue care at specified intervals throughout pregnancy (Beck et al. 2002). Lack of prenatal care is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, low birthweight, and infant death (Beck et al. 2002). From 1995 to 2002, women who had no prenatal care consistently had approximately five times the risk of infant death of women who received prenatal care during any trimester (Table III.2).

Table III.2.Infant Mortality Rate, by Trimester Prenatal Care Began: United States, 2002[D]

The link between prenatal care and adverse birth outcomes is not fully understood, but research indicates that early, regular prenatal care is associated with a decreased risk of poor birth outcomes (Vintzileos et al. 2002a, 2002b). Examination of trimester when prenatal care began by race/ethnicity demonstrates that Whites and Asian/Pacific Islanders had the highest percentages of women who initiated prenatal care in the first trimester; American Indian/Alaska Natives and Blacks had the highest proportions of women who received late or no prenatal care in 2002 (Table III.3).

The racial/ethnic pattern of late or no prenatal care parallels infant mortality rates; Blacks and American Indian/Alaska Natives have both the highest rates of late or no prenatal care and the highest rates of infant mortality. When infant mortality is stratified by when trimester of pregnancy when prenatal care began, however, Blacks and American Indian/Alaska Natives have higher rates of infant mortality, regardless of timing of prenatal care (Table III.4). This suggests that differences in prenatal care only partially explain differences in infant mortality. Regardless of the causal link, prenatal care offers an opportunity for early risk assessment, intervention, and monitoring among those at risk for adverse birth outcomes.

Tables III.3 and III.4[D]

Folic Acid Use

Neural tube defects (NTD) occur in approximately one per 1,000 births in the United States. It is estimated that adequate levels of folic acid one month before conception and through the first trimester of pregnancy could prevent 50 to 70 percent of these defects (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1999a). NTDs were responsible for 1.4 percent of all infant deaths in 2000 (Williams et al. 2003). In addition, they are associated with spontaneous abortions and low birthweight/prematurity. Between 1996 and 1998, 74 percent of NTD-specific deaths were low birthweight, and 58 percent were preterm (Davidoff et al. 2002).2

The Healthy People 2010 goal is for 80 percent of women of child-bearing age to consume at least 400 micrograms of folic acid daily. Approximately only one in three women in the United States consume this amount (American Academy of Pediatrics 1999, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2005). Folic acid use was highest among White non-Hispanic women and lowest among Black non-Hispanic women

(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002a). Despite having lower levels of folic acid use, Black women had a lower NTD-specific infant mortality rate than White, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native women (Figure III.1). Black women had a rate of NTD-specific infant death of 8.6 per 100,000 live births, compared to 11.6, 9.8, and 11.5 for White, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native women, respectively. Infant mortality rates do not take into account spontaneous abortions that could be associated with NTD (Petrini et al. 2002). Therefore, the discrepancy in NTD-specific mortality rates between Blacks and Whites, in particular, could be connected to Black women having a higher rate of spontaneous fetal loss than White women; in 1999, 19.4 of 1,000 Black non-Hispanic women experienced fetal loss, compared to 14.8 of 1,000 White non-Hispanic women (Ventura et al. 2003). Further research is needed to examine this potential explanation.

Figure III.1.NTD-Specific Infant Mortality, by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 1996-1998[D]

 

Periodontal Care

Studies have shown that pregnant women with periodontal disease may be up to seven times more likely to deliver a preterm/low birthweight infant than those without such disease (American Acad-emy of Periodontology 2004). Hormone changes during pregnancy, especially in the second and third trimesters, can cause a greater reaction to dental plaque, resulting in increased swelling, bleeding, and redness of the gums leading to periodontal disease.The disease may contribute to as many as 45,000 (18 percent) of the preterm births that occur every year (Offenbach et al. 1996). This is more than the preterm births attributed to alcohol consumption and tobacco use combined.

Lower socioeconomic and minority status are associated with untreated periodontal disease. For example, Blacks and American Indian/Alaska Natives have a higher prevalence of periodontal disease than Whites, with Blacks having the highest rate of periodontal disease of all races/ethnicities (Skrepcinski andNiendorff 2000).
In addition, the disparity in the rate of disease between White and Black populations has increased since 1971 (Borrell et al. 2002). In general, Blacks are less likely to use dental services, which may increase the rate of periodontal disease or exacerbate its severity (Doty and Weech-Maldonado 2003).

Infant Sleep Position

SIDS is the leading cause of postneonatal mortality and the third leading cause of all infant mortality in the United States, accounting for approximately eight percent of all infant deaths (Mathews et al. 2004). Infant sleep position and sleep environment have been identified as modifiable factors that can help reduce the risk of SIDS. Although SIDS declined almost 35 percent between 1995 and 2002 to 57.1 per 100,000 live births, experts are concerned about disparities in the rate of SIDS among different racial/ethnic groups (Table III.5) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1996). As noted in Chapter II, American Indian/Alaska Native infants are more than twice as likely as White infants to die of SIDS, and Black infants have a SIDS rate more than twice the national average and that of Whites. The rate of SIDS among Blacks has also decreased at a lower rate than in the overall population. Despite having a SIDS rate below that of Blacks and American Indian/Alaska Natives for all years between 1997 and 2001, Puerto Ricans were the only racial/ethnic group for which the rate of SIDS increased during this time period.

Table III.5.SIDS Rate, by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 1995 - 2002[D]

Variations in infant sleep position may explain some of the disparity in the SIDS rate. A study conducted between 1994 and 1998 showed that 32 percent of Black mothers, compared to 17 percent of other mothers, place their infants to sleep in the prone position (on the stomach) (Willinger et al. 2000). Black infants who die of SIDS also have a higher prevalence of bed sharing and using bed surfaces other than those specifically designed and approved for infant use, as well as other risk factors for SIDS, such as smoking in the home, than White infants (Unger et al. 2003). Among American Indian/Alaska Natives, 16 to 24 percent put their babies to sleep on their stomach (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1998). American Indian/Alaska Native infants also have an increased risk of SIDS because their mothers are more likely than other mothers to binge drink during the first trimester of pregnancy; binge drinking increases the risk of SIDS eightfold among American Indian/Alaska Natives (Iyasu et al. 2002).

The Back to Sleep campaign, started in 1994,spreads awareness about the importance of sleepposition in the reduction of SIDS and racial/ethnic disparities in SIDS. Providers also play an important role in SIDS reduction by influencing the behavior of new mothers. In examining the relationship between information sources and SIDS risk behavior, specific instruction by a nurse or doctor in the hospital about how to properly place the infant for sleep positively influenced behavior after the mother left the hospital (Rasinski et al. 2003).

Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding provides nutritional and immunological benefits to the baby during and after the first year of life (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2000b). The American Academy of Pediatrics and the World Health Organization recommend that women breastfeed their infants for at least 1 year to reduce the incidence of acute illnesses (such as diarrhea, ear infections, pneumonia, and meningitis) and chronic diseases (such as SIDS, obesity, childhood leukemia, and asthma) (American Academy of Pediatrics 2004; Wolf 2003). Data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey of women with a live birth or infant death in 1988 showed that infants who were ever breastfed3 had a 21 percent decreased odds of postneonatal death, compared to infants who were not ever breastfed (Chen and Rogan 2004). After controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the study also found that breastfeeding reduced the odds of postneonatal deaths regardless of race. However, the magnitude of breastfeeding’s impact on postneonatal death differed between Black and non-Black populations. Breastfeeding decreased the odds of postneonatal death by 31 percent among Black infants, while it reduced the odds by 19 percent among non-Black infants.

Between 1971 and 2001, breastfeeding rates increased in the early postpartum period from 25 percent to 70 percent and at 6 months postpartum from 5 percent to 33 percent (Ryan et al. 2002). However, these breastfeeding rates are still below Healthy People 2010 objectives of 75 percent of women breastfeeding in the early postpartum period and 50 percent at 6 months (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2000a). The breastfeeding rate at 1 year in 2001 was 12 percent, which also is lower than the Healthy People 2010 goal of 25 percent at 1 year (Li et al. 2003; U.S.Department of Health and Human Services 2000a).

In particular, Black women have consistently lower rates of breast feeding than do White and Hispanic women. A report based on the 2004 National Immunization Survey indicated that 71.5 percent of non-Hispanic White children were ever breastfed in comparison to 50.1 percent of non-Hispanic Black children (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006). Continuing to breastfeed until at least 6 months of age was also higher among White non-Hispanic women (53.9 percent) than Black non-Hispanic women (43.2 percent). In addition, the 1988-1994 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of women with children ages 12 to 71 months found that 26 percent of Black women had ever breastfed their infant, compared to 60 percent of White women and 55 percent of Mexican American women (Li and Grummer-Strawn 2002). Results from the 2001 Ross Laboratory Mothers Survey of women with infants ages 6 to 12 months and the 2001 National Immunization Survey of women with children ages 19 to 35 months showed that Black women had lower rates than White and Hispanic women of ever breastfeeding in hospital, at 6 months, and at 12 months (Ryan et al. 2002; Li etal. 2003).

According to results from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, Black women in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) were also less likely than White women to receive breastfeeding advice from WIC counselors and more likely to receive bottle-feeding education from them (Beal et al. 2003). The disparity in breastfeeding behavior between Blacks and Whites who received breastfeeding advice was smaller than that between Blacks and Whites who did not receive advice, suggesting that increased education may help narrow the gap in breastfeeding practices.

Well-Child Care (Up to Two Years Old)

Health maintenance and preventive health care are important to a child’s well-being after birth. Due to a combination of medical advances and public health measures, the overall health status of children in the United States has improved considerably during the past several decades. Mortality between 1950 and 1987 was reduced by 63 percent for children ages 1 to 4, and well-child visits promoting vaccinations and other preventive health measures significantly contributed to this improvement (Middleton and Schroeder 2002).
Table III.6.Vaccination Coverage Among Children 19-35 Months of Age, by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 1999[D]

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Board of Family Practice recommend 11 well-child visits from birth to age 2 on the following schedule: at birth; at one week; and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months. Childhood vaccinations given during these visits have had a major impact on the reduction and elimination of many causes ofchildhood morbidity and mortality. For example, smallpox has been eradicated, and polio has been eliminated in the United States. Measles and Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) have also been reduced to record low numbers (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1999b).

Currently, the CDC recommends that all infants finish the series of vaccinations shown in Table III.6 by age 2 (Centers for Disease Control and Preven-tion 2004c). In 1999, 73 percent of children ages 19to 35 months met these recommendations (TableIII.6, last row). Compliance with vaccination varies by race/ethnicity; in general, White non-Hispanicand Asian/Pacific Islanders had slightly higher rates of vaccination than Black non-Hispanics and American Indians/Alaska Natives. Researchers also found that racial/ethnic disparities in childhood vaccination were not driven by socioeconomic status; regardless of income level, Black non-Hispanics had the lowest rates of vaccination for DTP, polio, MMR, and hepatitis B compared to other populations (Barker and Lumen 2001; Lumen et al. 2001). They also had the lowest completion rate of the vaccination series. No racial/ethnic group has met the Healthy People 2010 objective to have 90 percent of all children ages 19 to 35 months complete the vaccination series which indicates that there is room for improvement for all groups (U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services 2000a).

Interconceptional Care

The IOM notes, “One of the best protection savailable against low birthweight and other poor pregnancy outcomes is to have women actively plan for pregnancy, enter pregnancy in good health with as few risk factors as possible, and be fully informed about her reproductive and general health” (Institute of Medicine 1985). Experts suggest that, to restore the maternal nutritional resources necessary for a healthy pregnancy, it is essential to have one or more years between the birth of one infant and the conception of another (Klerman et al. 1998). Studies have shown that nearly a quarter of pregnant women have an interpregnancy period of less than a year (Zhu et al.2001; James et al. 1999; Russo et al. 1993). Short interpregnancy intervals are associated with late entry into prenatal care, low birthweight, premature birth, and other poor pregnancy outcomes. Williamset al. (2003) found that, compared to infants born following an interpregnancy interval of less than 6 months, infants born to women who became pregnant 18 to 59 months after a prior birth had a lower risk of dying, being born preterm, being small for gestational age, or having low birthweight. Another study showed that infants born to women who become pregnant less than 6 months after delivery have three times the risk of infant death due to intentional injury, a 74 percent increased risk of unintentional injuries, and a 55 percent increased risk of SIDS (Easton 1999). Black and Native American women have the highest rates of short interpregnancy intervals, compared to other racial/ethnic groups. From 1981 to 1989, 30 percent of Native American pregnancies were conceived less than a year after a prior birth, compared to 19 percent of pregnancies among White non-Hispanics (Khoshnood et al. 1998). Studies have shown that Black women are twice as likely as White women to have an interpregnancy period of 6 months or less (James et al. 1999; Zhu et al. 2001). Even among Black and White women with interpregnancy periods of 6 months or less, Blacks still had a higher rate of pretermbirth than Whites. Although this suggests that other risk factors may act in conjunction with a short interpregnancy period to cause disparities in birth outcomes, having an adequate interpregnancy period may protect against poor birth outcomes for all women.

Risky Behaviors

Maternal Smoking

Research suggests that infants born to women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy have a 40 percent higher risk of death in their first year than infants whose mothers did not smoke (Salihu et al.2003). In the United States, an estimated five percent of infant mortality is attributable to smoking, with variation among different races and ethnicities. Smoking during pregnancy contributes to many adverse outcomes, including ectopic pregnancy, fetal death, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, low birthweight, preterm delivery, SIDS, intrauterine growth retardation, placenta previa, abruptio placenta, and premature rupture of membranes. Morbidity and mortality increase with the amount of cigarettes consumed prenatally (Salihu et al. 2003).

Although the overall rate of smoking during pregnancy declined 33 percent between 1990 and 1999, more than 10 percent of women reported smoking during pregnancy in 1999 (Figure III.2). Rates of reported smoking were the highest among American Indian/Alaska Natives, who also had the lowest rate of decrease in reported smoking during pregnancy between 1990 and 1999. All other races and ethnicities reduced the reported rate of smoking during pregnancy by more than 20 percent, while American Indian/Alaska Natives reduced their reported rate by 11 percent.

The high rate of smoking during pregnancy among American Indian/Alaska Natives may contribute to their high rate of SIDS. However, due to the interaction of smoking with other factors that contribute to adverse birth outcomes, the direct impact of smoking during pregnancy on infant mortality is difficult to tease out. For example, why does smoking during pregnancy differentially affect infant survival across racial/ethnic groups? Smoking among Whites is associated with a 85 percent increased risk of infant mortality, while it is associated with an increased risk of 53, 147,and 57 percent among Blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and American Indian/Alaska Natives, respectively (Figure III.3). It is difficult to understand the direct effect of smoking on birth outcomes, but it is clear that, for all racial/ethnic groups, women who smoked during pregnancy had higher rates of infant mortality than women who did not smoke.

In addition to the adverse effect that smoking during pregnancy has on infants, smoke exposure after birth also has negative impacts on infant health.

Figure III.2.Women Who Reported Smoking During Pregnancy, by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 1999[D]
Figure III.3.Infant Mortality Rate, by Maternal Smoking Status and Race/Ethnicity: United States, 2002[D]

Research has shown that secondhand cigarette smoke exposure increases the risk of respiratory illnesses among infants. Such illnesses, including asthma and lower respiratory tract infections, can lead to respiratory distress, the sixth leading causes of infant mortality in 2002 (DiFranza and Lew 1996). Although the overall rate of secondhand smoke exposure among infants has not been precisely measured, examination of smoking behavior by race shows that American Indian/Alaska Natives have the highest rate of tobacco use in comparison to other races and ethnicities (Table III.7).

To encourage pregnant and non-pregnant women of all races/ethnicities to stop smoking, the U.S. Public Health Service sponsors a best practice guideline called the “5 A’s” (U.S. Surgeon General 2005). The “5 A’s” guideline includes five steps to identify tobacco users and implement appropriate interventions based on their willingness to quit. The five major steps to intervention are: (1) ask about smoking status; (2) advise in a clear, strong, and personalized manner why the person should quit; (3) assess the willingness of the person to quit; (4) assist the person using counseling and pharmacotherapy if they are willing to quit; and (5) arrange for follow-up with the person. This guideline provides a conceptual framework for interventions to motivate pregnant and non-pregnant women to quit smoking.

Table III.7.Reported Tobacco Use by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 2003[D]

Alcohol and Other Drug Use During Pregnancy

Drinking alcohol during the first seven months of pregnancy is associated with preterm delivery and low birthweight (Lundsberg et al. 1997). Though the risk of having poor birth outcomes rises with increasing alcohol use, any fetal alcohol exposure puts a fetus at risk for developing fetal alcohol syndrome.4 Fetal alcohol exposure is the leading cause of preventable birth defects and developmental disorders in the United States. As many as 1 in 100 children in the United States are believed to be affected by fetal alcohol exposure, although fetal alcohol syndrome is 100 percent preventable (Meschke et al. 2003).

Data from the CDC’s Birth Defects Monitoring Program showed that fetal alcohol syndrome increased fourfold between 1979 and 1992, to 3.7 cases per 10,000 live births (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2003a). In 1992, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data indicated that more than 12.4 percent of women reported drinking alcohol during pregnancy (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002b). Since 1992, the prevalence of reported alcohol use among pregnant women has increased slightly, to 12.8 percent in 1999, and decreased slightly, to 12.5 percent in 2001 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002b; Floyd and Sidhu 2004). According to data reported on birth certificates, alcohol use during pregnancy was more frequent among American Indian/Alaska Natives than any other racial/ethnic group (Table III.8); they had three times the alcohol use rate during pregnancy of any other racial/ethnic group. Black and White women had the second-highest rate of alcohol use, while Hispanics had the lowest rate.

Table III.8.Reported Alcohol Use During Pregancy,by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 2002[D]

The rate of fetal alcohol syndrome among different racial/ethnic groups follows a pattern similar to that of alcohol use among these groups during pregnancy. In 1994, the CDC’s National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reported that American Indian/Alaska Natives had more than fou rtimes the rate of fetal alcohol syndrome (30 cases per 10,000 births) than any other group; Black women had the second-highest rate (6 cases per 10,000 births) (Meschke et al. 2003). In contrast,Whites had an incidence of 0.9 cases per 10,000 births, followed by Hispanics (0.8 cases per 10,000 births) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (0.3 cases per 10,000 births).

Use of other substances, such as cocaine, marijuana, or other illicit drugs5, during pregnancy is another risk factor for preterm, low birthweight, and very low birthweight births (Blatt et al. 2000).Women who use drugs such as cocaine during pregnancy have more than twice the odds of delivering a preterm, low birthweight, or very low birthweight baby as pregnant women who do not use any substances (Blatt et al. 2000; March of Dimes 2004). Women who use cocaine during pregnancy are also twice as likely as women who do not to have an infant die of SIDS and five times more likely to have a baby with a birth defect. Substance users are more likely than non-users to miss prenatal care appointments (Funai et al. 2003).

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s 2000 and 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 3.7 percent of women reported using illicit drugs during pregnancy (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2002). Of the women who reported any illicit drug use during pregnancy, 70 percent reported using marijuana, and 8 percent reported using cocaine. Of those who used illicit drugs during pregnancy, more than half also smoked cigarettes or drank alcohol (Shahul and Gfroerer 2003).

Drug use varies by race/ethnicity, with non-White women being almost twice as likely as White women to use illicit drugs (Kelly et al. 2002). Drug use during pregnancy has a differential impact on racial/ethnic groups; Black women who report illicit substance use had approximately a twofold increase in odds of delivering a preterm, low birthweight, or very low birthweight infant, compared to White women who reported illicit substance use (Kelly et al. 2002; March of Dimes 2004). This implies that drug use, like smoking, may be associated with other risk factors for poor perinatal outcomes.

Adolescent Pregnancy

Every year in the United States, more than 800,000 adolescent girls ages 15 to 19 become pregnant (Ventura et al. 2004). The rate of teenage pregnancy declined by nearly 10 percent between 1990 and 2000, to 104 pregnancies per 1,000 teenagers. However, the rate of births to adolescents in the United States still ranks much higher than that of most other developed countries, such as Sweden, France, Canada, and Great Britain (Darroch et al. 2001). In 2001, there were 43.5 births per 1,000 teenagers in the United States (Hamilton et al. 2003). Children born to teenagers have an increased risk of low birthweight, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, congenital malformations, and infant death (Cunnington 2001). Before controlling for demographic factors, adolescents have an infant mortality rate 1.6 times that of women older than age 20 (Mathews et al. 2004). When controlling for race and ethnicity, White and Asian/ Pacific Islander teenagers have more than two times the infant mortality rate of their older counterparts, while Black and American Indian/Alaska Native teenagers have rates of infant mortality comparable to those of their older counterparts; Hispanic teenagershave 1.4 times the rate of their older counterparts (Mathews et al. 2004) (Appendix A, Table A.12). Although these results indicate that the risk of teenage pregnancy varies by race, pregnant teenagers are more likely than pregnant adults to have health behaviors that lead to poor birth outcomes, regardless of race (Elfenbein and Felice 2003). For example, they are less likely to gain adequate weight during pregnancy, take recommended daily vitamins during pregnancy, have good eating habits, and seek prenatal care. They are also more likely to smoke, drink alcohol, or take drugs and to have a shorter interpregnancy interval.

Black teenagers have nearly three times the pregnancy rate of White teenagers, and Hispanic teenagers have twice the rate of White teenagers (Ventura etal. 2004). Infants born to Black teenagers also have a higher rate of infant mortality than those born to Whiteteenagers (Figure III.4). However, Hispanic teenagers have lower rates of infant mortality than White teenagers, although they had a higher number of pregnancies. The high teenage Hispanic birth rate and low infant mortality rate suggest that the risky behaviors associated with teenage pregnancy may be mitigated by other factors, such as culture. For example, one study found that the Mexican culture had a positive impact on birth outcomes (Jenny et al.2001). That study also found that Mexican American infants born in counties with a high concentration of Mexican births to women of Mexican descent that is, a higher exposure to those with traditional Mexican pregnancy and child-rearing practices had lower mortality rates than Mexican American women without such exposure.

Figure III.4.Infant Mortality Rate Among Teenagers Younger than 20 by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 2002[D]

BIOLOGICAL/SOCIAL RISK FACTORS

PERINATAL DEPRESSION

Untreated depression during pregnancy is associated with adverse fetal outcomes. These include spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, need for special neonatal care, increased uterine artery resistance, small head circumference, low APGA Rscores, neonatal growth retardation, high cortisol levels at birth, maternal hypertension, and preeclampsia (Bonari et al. 2004). Mental illness can affect a pregnant woman’s functional status and her ability to obtain prenatal care, eat properly, take prenatal vitamins, and avoid dangerous behavior, such as smoking, drinking alcohol, and using illicit drugs (Bonari et al. 2004; Zuckerman et al. 1989). In addition, research has shown that depression can negatively affect women’s parenting behavior, which has implications for their children’s health (Kavanaugh et al. 2006).

Approximately 10 percent of women in the United States have depressive symptoms during pregnancy. For a third of these women, it represents their first episode of major depression (Nonacs and Cohen 2003). The prevalence of depression is higher among those of low socioeconomic status (Hobfolland Ritter 1995). Studies have not conclusively shown a relationship between race and depression during pregnancy; however, one study found that, in general, Blacks and Hispanics exhibit elevated rates of depression compared to Whites (Dunlop etal. 2003).

STRESS

Stress during pregnancy has been shown to significantly increase rates of prematurity and low birthweight (Copper et al. 1996). According to a study of 2,593 pregnant women performed through the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of NIH, women who experience stress during pregnancy, as measured by a 28-item Likert scale, are at 1.16 and 1.08 higher odds for delivering premature and low birthweight infants, respectively, than women who do not experience stress during pregnancy. Behaviors further increasing the risk of prematurity and low birthweight, such as smoking, substance abuse, and poor weight gain during pregnancy, have been reported to be more prevalent among women who are under stress. In addition, it has been hypothesized that psychological distress may cause the secretion of placental corticotropin, releasing hormone (CRH) that can lead to increased susceptibility to infections, such as bacterial vaginosis (Krameret al. 2001).

Exposure to psychosocial stressors among Black women in an urban setting has been shown to significantly increase the occurrence of low birthweight (Orr et al. 1996). This may be due to factors such as smoking, substance abuse, prevalence of infection, or poverty; the exact mechanism is not well understood.

BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS

Between 25 and 60 percent of preterm births are attributable to maternal infections that can lead to infant morbidity and mortality (Flynn et al. 1999).One such infection, bacterial vaginosis (BV), is estimated to be prevalent in 16 percent of pregnant women and 10 to 30 percent of nonpregnant women (Hillier et al. 1995). The vaginal flora imbalance that occurs with BV has been associated with preterm delivery, low birthweight, premature rupture of membranes, infection of the chorion and amnion,and infection of the amniotic fluid. Women with BV during pregnancy have 1.4 times the odds of delivering a low birthweight infant of pregnant women who do not have BV (Hillier et al. 1995). Preterm delivery among those with BV can be reduced by 18 percent with antibiotic prophylaxis (Hauth et al.1995).

Abstaining from douching and reducing stress during pregnancy can also significantly decrease BV (Culhane et al. 2001; Holzman et al. 2001). A study conducted through the NIH and the CDC’s National Survey of Family Growth found that Black women have higher rates than White and Hispanic women of vaginal douching, and have higher levels of stress (Copper et al. 1996; Centers for Disease Control andPrevention 2003b). Both douching and stress may contribute to pregnant Black women having three times the prevalence of BV than White women (Fiscella 2004; Paige et al. 1998).

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Research conducted in the United States between 1963 and 1995 reveals that up to 20 percent of women experience domestic violence during pregnancy (Gazmararian et al. 1996; Coker etal. 2004). The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System found that, in 17 States surveyed, non-White women, Hispanic women, and women with Medicaid were consistently at higher risk of physical abuse by a husband or partner than their White, non-Hispanic, and non-Medicaid counterparts (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002c). Physical abuse at this time can cause maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Research suggests that physical violence during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of antepartum hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, and perinatal death. Rates of low birthweight among battered women are also 1.5 to 2.5 times higher than those of nonbattered women, and rates of preterm birth are 2.5 to 4.0 times higher (Gazmararian et al. 1996;Neggers et al. 2004). A recent study shows that women who experienced intimate partner violence during pregnancy had 3.8 times the odds of antepartum hemorrhage, 3.1 times the odds of intrauterine growth restriction, and 8.1 times the odds of perinatal death of women who did not experience such violence (Janssen et al. 2003). Physical abuse during pregnancy has also been found to be associated with many other risk factors for infant mortality, such as inadequate prenatal care, smoking, substance abuse, mental health-related illness, and short interpregnancy interval (Curry et al. 1998; Lipsky et al. 2004).

MATERNAL BIRTHWEIGHT

Maternal birthweight has been suggested as a determinant of low infant birthweight and preterm delivery. Research has shown that women who were themselves born at a low birthweight or preterm are at significantly higher risk for having low birthweight or preterm infants than women who were not low birthweight or preterm (Coutinho etal. 1997; Porter et al. 1997; Sanderson et al. 1995; Wang et al. 1995). One study in Buffalo, New York, found that, compared to women who weighed 8.0 pounds at birth, women who weighed 6.0 to 7.9 pounds at birth and women who weighed 4.0 to 5.9 pounds at birth had 1.7 and 3.5 greater odds of de-livering a low birthweight infant, respectively (Klenbanoff et al. 1984). Sanderson et al. (1995) found that, although both White and Black women who were low birthweight themselves were at higher risk of delivering low birthweight infants, only Black women who weighed less than 4.0 pounds at birth had significantly greater risk of delivering a normal birthweight infant who subsequently died before reaching 1 year of age. These researchers also demonstrated that higher prepregnancy weight and height among women born low birthweight reduced the risk of low birthweight deliveries. Such results suggest that, although low maternal birthweight plays an important role in birth outcomes, other factors may also mitigate the effects of maternal low birthweight and prematurity.

Birthweight may appear to be a genetically transmitted characteristic because of its seeming intergenerational trend; however, recurring and similar social and environmental stress across generations could cause familial clustering of low birthweight. Lu and Halfron (2003) examined the link between poor maternal and infant birth outcomes in the context of a life course perspective. These researchers proposed a model where there are critical periods in a woman’s reproductive life when she is more vulnerable to risk factors and more amenable to protective factors. The earliest of these sensitive periods occurs when the baby grows in the mother’s womb. Consequently, if a woman is exposed to risks during her time in utero, her reproductive potential will be adversely affected and could result in poor birth outcomes for herself and her own infant. In addition, if she continues to experience other stresses during her life, which are likely similar to the stresses her mother experienced, her risk of having an infant with poor birth outcomes may increase.

This life course perspective suggests that, because a woman’s birth outcome and subsequent pregnancies are influenced by the accumulated life exposure of her mother and female ancestors before her, a short period of intervention during the pregnancy period may not be able to cause a dramatic decrease in the risk of poor birth outcomes. According to this model, the racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes we see today can be explained by many lifetimes of amassed racism, poverty, and stress. Many social and environmental risk factors need to be addressed during the birth, childhood, puberty, and young adulthood of a woman to influence her infant’s birth outcome, but intervening during the pregnancy and interpregnancy period remains key to improving birth outcomes; targeting women during, and immediately after, pregnancy is a way to identify high-risk women and address their risks to improve outcomes for future generations (Kotelchuck 2003).

a Mother and her Baby

 

 

2 Reported infant mortality rates do not account for spontaneous abortions.

3Infants were considered “ever-breastfed” if their mother answered “yes” to the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey Question, “Did you ever breastfeed this infant?”

4Fetal alcohol syndrome is defined as a group of symptoms caused by a pregnant woman’s consumption of alcohol. These symptoms include abnormal facial features, growth impairment, problems with learning, memory, attention span, problem solving, speech, and hearing.

5Illicit drugs are controlled substances that possess a high potential for abuse, have no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and demonstrate a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2004). Controlled substances so defined fall under seven headings: marijuana (marijuana, hashish); stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine); depressants (barbiturates, tranquilizers, hypnotics); hallucinogens (acid, PCP); opiates, or narcotics (heroin, morphine, opium, codeine); inhalants (sprays, solvents, glue);and designer drugs (synthetic drugs similar in effect to stimulants, hallucinogens, and narcotics). To be used legally and safely, some of these drugs must be prescribed by a physician. This list is not comprehensive; omitted substance may be illegal and may fall under the designation of controlled substances.